FazTimes Media, New York City, USA, 28 Oct – The race for New York City’s mayoral seat has become one of the most heated political battles in recent memory, pitting two dramatically different visions of leadership against each other. On one side stands former Governor Andrew Cuomo, a seasoned and controversial figure hoping for political redemption. On the other hand, there is Zohran Mamdani, a 34-year-old democratic socialist and state assemblyman whose progressive platform has electrified the city’s youth and working class.

As the November 4 election nears, political observers say the contest has transcended party lines to become a referendum on the city’s identity—and the kind of future New Yorkers want for themselves.

A Divided Electorate

Chris Berwick, a 58-year-old contractor from Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, describes himself as a lifelong Republican. Yet this year, he’s preparing to vote for Cuomo—a Democrat.

Berwick’s dilemma captures the mood among many moderate and conservative-leaning New Yorkers who, despite deep misgivings about Cuomo’s past scandals, see him as a bulwark against Mamdani’s progressive surge.

Cuomo’s strategy is clear: appeal to centrists, independents, and uneasy conservatives who would otherwise back Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa—but fear splitting the anti-Mamdani vote.

Polls, however, paint a steep climb. Even in the most optimistic surveys, Cuomo trails Mamdani by eight percentage points; most show the gap at 13 to 24 points, with Sliwa polling between 9 and 20 percent.

Cuomo’s Redemption Tour

After resigning as governor in 2021 amid sexual misconduct allegations, many assumed Cuomo’s political career was over. But his return to the public stage has been marked by a calculated outreach to disillusioned voters and a promise to restore “stability and pragmatism” to a city he says has become too experimental.

Cuomo specifically targets his message. On conservative talk shows and in Republican-heavy neighborhoods like Staten Island and southern Brooklyn, he’s been pitching himself as a “common-sense Democrat” who can keep crime down and business thriving. “I don’t have horns,” he joked on Sid Rosenberg’s conservative radio show earlier this month.

This rhetorical pivot—positioning himself as a centrist savior—has drawn both praise and criticism. Supporters say Cuomo is the only candidate with the experience and grit to manage a $116 billion city budget. Detractors call it political opportunism from a man still shadowed by scandal.

The Fear of ‘Socialist Experimentation’

Cuomo’s campaign has leaned heavily on the argument that Mamdani’s agenda is unrealistic and potentially dangerous for the city’s financial stability.

Mamdani’s platform includes free public buses, universal childcare, rent freezes, and higher taxes on corporations and the ultra-wealthy—proposals that have captured the imagination of younger and lower-income voters but alarmed business leaders.

“New York is not a place for experiments,” said Yiatin Chu, a Queens community leader supporting Cuomo. “You can’t just wing it with a $100 billion-plus city budget. This is not a college project.”

Chu, who heads the Asian Wave Alliance, says she’s concerned about public safety and overambitious spending. She supports Cuomo’s plan to add 5,000 NYPD officers and maintain a steady fiscal policy.

Generational Clash: Vision vs. Experience

The difference between the two candidates is not just about ideas but also about age and background. Mamdani, whose parents came from South Asia to Uganda, has brought in a group of passionate volunteers who believe in his campaign as a push for fairness and bringing everyone together.

If elected, he would be New York City’s first Muslim and first African-born mayor—milestones that have turned his campaign into a symbol of cultural progress.

Meanwhile, Cuomo, 67, relies on his legacy and managerial experience, positioning himself as a stable presence amidst turbulent times. “It’s experience versus experiments,” says Anne, a 68-year-old Cuomo volunteer from Brooklyn. “This city needs stability, not slogans.”

Yet even Cuomo’s backers admit that Mamdani’s youthful energy is difficult to counter. His social media strategy, spearheaded by the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), has dominated online spaces and mobilized thousands of first-time voters.

The Money Divide

The difference in money between the two campaigns says a lot. Bloomberg News reports that groups supporting Cuomo and those opposing Mamdani raised more than $14.5 million from June to October. A lot of this money came from real estate developers, Wall Street leaders, and wealthy people who support Israel, such as Bill Ackman and Miriam Adelson.

Mamdani’s PACs, meanwhile, have raised around $1.7 million, relying primarily on small donations and grassroots fundraising.

Critics say Cuomo’s backers represent the city’s elite establishment, while Mamdani’s campaign reflects bottom-up activism. “Cuomo’s money comes from people who already run this city,” said progressive organizer Dana Patel. “Mamdani’s money comes from the people who actually live here.”

Still, Cuomo’s camp argues that the backing of big business isn’t a liability—it’s a necessity. “We need leaders who can negotiate, manage, and protect jobs,” said Michael LaRosa, a 30-year-old electrician from Queens. “Cuomo gets that.”

Culture Wars and Accusations

As the campaign enters its final stretch, the tone has turned increasingly bitter. Cuomo’s camp has been accused of Islamophobic fear-mongering, especially after the former governor implied in an interview that Mamdani sympathized with “terrorists”—a statement condemned by Governor Kathy Hochul, his former deputy.

Mamdani, who has been vocal in his support for Palestinian rights, has faced a barrage of attacks from pro-Israel groups and conservative commentators. Cuomo has also tied Mamdani to “anti-police rhetoric,” referencing his past calls to defund the NYPD—a stance Mamdani has since clarified and moderated.

Political analysts say Cuomo’s aggressive attacks may help him consolidate conservative voters but could further alienate younger progressives.

The Republican Factor

The presence of Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate and founder of the Guardian Angels, adds another layer of complexity. Sliwa’s supporters fear that his continued presence in the race could split the anti-Mamdani vote, inadvertently handing victory to the socialist frontrunner.

Even some conservatives have urged Sliwa to step aside. “A vote for Sliwa is a vote for Mamdani,” Cuomo said recently, urging right-leaning voters to unite behind him.

But Sliwa remains defiant. “Cuomo should quit and go back to the Hamptons,” he said on his radio show.

A City at a Crossroads

The race has become about more than just personalities—it’s a battle over what New York represents.

Cuomo's message about being skilled and careful connects with voters who are worried about crime, housing prices, and the economy. Mamdani's strong promises attract people who are frustrated with traditional politics and unfair systems.

“I voted for Cuomo in the primary, but I’m thinking again,” said Junior Shall, a 67-year-old childcare worker in Brooklyn. “The young people want something different. Maybe they’re right.” As election day looms, that sentiment may decide the outcome.

The Verdict Ahead

With just under two weeks left, Cuomo is struggling. To win, he probably needs some Republicans to switch sides, support from independent and undecided voters, and a strong turnout in wealthy areas of the city.

Mamdani’s team is counting on strong community support and the energy of younger voters to push past the old political system.

No matter who wins, the 2025 New York City mayoral race has already changed how people talk about politics in the city. It’s making the old power groups face a new kind of political movement and different ideas about society.

As political commentator Rashida Khan said, “This isn’t just about Cuomo versus Mamdani. It’s about Old New York facing off against the New New York—and the city’s future depends on which side wins.”

Related Posts